Before exercise and on Days 1 and 4, the plasma taurine concentration in the TAU and COMB groups was significantly increased

compared with that in the PLCB and BA groups (Figure 2A). No significant differences in the plasma concentrations of total BCAA and individual BCAAs (valine, leucine, or isoleucine) were AZD8931 price observed among the groups at any time points (Figure 2B-E). Figure 2 Plasma taurine (A), BCAA (B), valine (C), leucine (D) and isoleucine find more (E) concentrations. Abbreviations: PLCB, placebo supplementation group; BA, BCAA supplementation group; TAU, taurine supplementation group; COMB, combined (BCAA + taurine) supplementation group; PRE, prior to amino acid supplementation; BEx, before exercise; Day1, 1st day after exercise; Day4, 4th day after exercise. Data are expressed as means ± S.E. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus the PLCB and BA groups by one-way ANOVA. The plasma albumin Bindarit order concentration (4.0–5.3 g/dL) in all subjects

was within the normal range, and no significant differences were observed between the groups throughout the experimental period (data not shown). Delayed onset muscle soreness following eccentric exercise Figure 3A shows the VAS scores for subjective DOMS assessment. The VAS scores in all groups were significantly higher on Day 1 compared with before exercise. The VAS scores in the BA and COMB groups peaked on Day 1 while those in the PLCB and TAU groups peaked on Day 2. The increased VAS scores in all groups declined by Day 4. In the COMB group, the VAS scores on Day 2 were significantly lower than in the PLCB group. Figure 3 VAS score (A) and CIR (B) throughout the experiment. VAS score was used as subjectively assessment from of muscle soreness in the exercised arm. CIR value as an indirect marker of muscle damage is presented as differences from the respective BEx. Both parameters were also shown

as the AUC from BEx to Day4. Abbreviations: VAS, visual analog scale; AUC, area under the curve; CIR, upper arm circumference. Data are expressed as means ± S.E. *P < 0.05 versus the PLCB group by one-way ANOVA. a,b,c,d show the significant difference compared with the corresponding Pre in the PLCB, BCAA, TAU, and COMB groups, respectively, and single and double characters mean P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively, by repeated measures ANOVA. Indirect marker of muscle damage CIR as an indirect marker of muscle damage is shown in Figure 3B. CIR differences increased significantly and immediately after exercise in all groups and declined by Day 1. Thereafter, the CIR differences in all groups increased significantly until the end of the experimental period. In the COMB group, the CIR differences were lower than in the other groups throughout the experimental period, with significant differences on Days 2 and 3 compared with the PLCB group.