Two Texel-cross sires carrying 1 copy of the A allele were mated

Two Texel-cross sires carrying 1 copy of the A allele were mated to approximately 200 ewes carrying 0, 1, or 2 copies of the A allele. A total of 187 progeny were generated and genotyped to determine whether they were carrying 0, 1, or 2 copies of the A allele. The progeny were assigned to 1 of 4 slaughter groups balanced for the 3 genotypes, sex, and sire. The 4 groups were slaughtered commercially when their average BW (across all progeny

in the slaughter group) reached 33, 40, 43, and 48 kg, respectively. Measurements of BW, and carcass dimensions and yield were made on all animals using AP24534 purchase Viascan (a commercial 2-dimensional imaging system that estimates lean content of the carcass as a percentage of total carcass weight). Additional measurements were made on the fourth slaughter group, which was computed tomography scanned at each slaughter time point to obtain 4 serial measures of lean and fat as estimated from the computed tomography images. The A allele did not have an effect on any BW traits. The A allele was associated with increased muscle and decreased fat across the variety of measures of muscling and fat, explaining between 0.2 and 1.1 of a residual SD unit. Estimates for an additive effect were significant and were positive

for muscle and negative for fat traits. No dominance effect estimates (positive or negative) were significant. There was no significant interaction between A allele number and carcass weight or slaughter group for any trait. This is the first systematic study RG-7112 in vivo of

the effect of the A allele copy number over a range of carcass weights (13 to 20 kg) and ages and results Entinostat suggest the size of the effect across these end-points is proportionately the same. Testing for the A allele therefore offers breeders the potential to improve rates of genetic gain for lean-meat yield across most production systems.”
“Behavioral sensitization occurs after repeated administration of mu-opioid receptor agonists following a drug-free period. It seems that the changes in dopaminergic systems induced by mu-opioid receptor agonists play a crucial role in behavioral sensitization to opioids. Nitric oxide also plays a role in some behavioral effects of morphine, including sensitization to the locomotor-stimulating effect. This study investigated whether morphine sensitization appears in seizure threshold and the possible role of mu-opioid receptor and nitric oxide in this sensitization. Sensitization was produced by daily injections of morphine (0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 15, or 30 mg/kg), followed by a 10-day washout period. Then the challenge test was performed using morphine (0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 15, or 30 mg/kg) in different groups.

Comments are closed.