A mixed methods study was carried out which involved a semi-struc

A mixed methods study was carried out which involved a semi-structured interview comprising both closed-ended and open-ended questions about physiotherapists’ perceptions of being involved in a randomised

trial. Physiotherapists involved in delivering the intervention in the MOBILISE trial were contacted by email to see if they would be interested in participating in this study. buy Lapatinib The participating therapists then underwent an interview either face-to-face or via telephone. All interviews were carried out by the same researcher, who had a Masters Degree. This researcher did not deliver the intervention and was not employed by any of the sites that participated

in the multicentre MOBILISE trial. Interviews of up to 45 minutes were conducted using an interview guide (Box 1). The first half of the interview consisted of closedended questions requiring yes/no answers with participants being invited to explain their responses. The second half of the interview consisted of open-ended questions allowing the participants to elaborate on their experiences of being involved in the trial. Responses were recorded by detailed notes during the interview. The interviews were conducted within six months of the physiotherapists finishing their involvement in the MOBILISE trial. More specific information about selleck products the design and intervention of this trial can be found in Ada et al (2007). Closed-ended questions When you were involved in the MOBILISE trial: • Did you have a preference for your patients to get one intervention or the other? If yes, which one? Open-ended questions To begin the process of gaining non-directional

responses the participants were asked the following question: • Is there any feedback you would like to give the researchers? these Physiotherapists who had been involved in delivering the intervention in the MOBILISE trial were included if they were qualified physiotherapists, prepared to undergo a semistructured interview, and had delivered the intervention to at least one control and one experimental patient. They were excluded if they had been involved in carrying out the intervention for less than one year. Answers to the closed-ended questions are presented as number (%) of participants. Answers to the open-ended questions were examined using thematic analysis (Rice and Ezzy 1999). Initially, the text of each interview was read several times to identify concepts which were then coded.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>