Figure 1. and Figure 2. show the #Cabozantinib randurls[1|1|,|CHEM1|]# results of the pre-post assessment calculated for completers. For this analysis, we added subjects from the myMCT group who did not read the manual to the waitlist group. When we removed this subgroup from the waitlist sample, as one could argue that the nonreaders represent a special group, status and level of significance did not change for any of the analyses. For some OCI-R variables, numerical differences in favor of the myMCT Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical emerged even more strongly. Figure 1. Patients in the myMCT group showed greater

improvement on the Y-BOCS total score than the waitlist group who numerically slightly worsened (P<.01, d=.63). This result was especially owing to a decline on obsessions (P<.005, d=.69), while ... Figure 2. Group differences on the OCI-R and BDI-SF. Patients in the myMCT group showed significantly more decline than the waitlist group on the OCI-R total score (P<.001, d=.70) as well as BDI-SF (P<.05, d=.50). Subanalyses showed especially strong ... Across all domains, symptom improvements Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical were stronger for the

myMCT group. Significant differences were found for the Y-BOCS total score (t(71)=2.68, P<.01; d=.63) which primarily reflected greater symptom decline in the myMCT group for the obsessions subscale (t(71)=3.00, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical P<.01; d=.69). For the compulsions subscale, no significant difference emerged (t(71)=.86, P>.1, d=.20). The difference on the OCI-R Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical score also achieved significance (t(71)=2.92, P<. 001; d=.70), particularly owing to a greater decline on the subscales measuring obsessing and hoarding. The BDI-SF score also declined significantly more strongly in the myMCT in the range of a medium effect size (t(71)=2.25, P<.05, d=.5). Completer analyses We separated the initial sample (n=86) into three groups according to completion status and adherence: completers (n=65), noncompleters (n=12), and completers but nonreaders (n=9; ie, allocated to the myMCT group but did not read the manual). Nonreaders had significantly reduced baseline Y-BOCS total scores in comparison to noncompleters (P=.04). The Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical difference to completers was in the same direction but only approached trend level (P=.07). This result

very was primarily due to differences in the Y-BOCS obsessions subscale: nonreaders showed significantly lower scores compared with completers (P=.01) and noncompleters (P=.03). Further, on the OCI-checking subscale nonreaders had lower scores than noncompleters (P=.04). At trend level (=.06), nonreaders had lower scores on the obsessing subscale compared with the completers. To summarize, while noncompleters were indistinguishable from completers, nonreaders showed attenuated symptoms and thus perhaps less leidensdruck (psychological distress). Outcome predictors Additionally, we investigated which baseline variables best predicted outcome, defined as the pre-post difference on the Y-BOCS total score. Patients with high baseline Y-BOCS total scores benefited most from the training.