GPBD 4 is a good example of an improved variety that was developed as a second cycle derivative of an interspecific cross. Synthetics may be another effective way for bringing useful genes from wild relatives. In this direction, several synthetics are now available by using different diploid species and these

need to be utilized for improving the cultivated gene pool [14], [15], [16] and [17]. Thus, in this study, highly diverse Lenvatinib molecular weight synthetics were used to introgress disease resistance in five cultivars. As a result, foliar disease (leaf rust and LLS) resistance was introgressed into one or more of the genetic backgrounds of ICGV 91114, ICGS 76, ICGV 91278, JL 24, and DH 86 using two synthetic resistance sources namely ISATGR 278-18

and ISATGR 5B (Table 3). Seed setting percentage improved with repeated backcrossing. The presence of phenotypic traits from the donor synthetics enabled confirmation of hybrids as crossing in groundnut can be very difficult. In later generations, the presence of one or more of these traits still enabled confirmation of backcross hybrids. Backcrossed introgression lines in different generations were scored for rust and LLS response and lines possessing disease resistance were identified. Of the 10 attempted combinations, resistant derivatives were obtained in high frequencies for ICGS 76 × ISATGR 5B and DH 86 × ISATGR 278-18. Unfortunately, no resistant plant could be recovered from JL 24 × ISATGR 5B and ICGV 91114 × ISATGR

5B. It is clearly evident that the frequency and level of resistance to selleck inhibitor both diseases were higher among crosses involving ISATGR 278-18 compared to ISATGR 5B. Thus, ISATGR 278-18 appears to be a potentially better source of disease resistance and other agronomic traits for further diversifying the primary gene pool of groundnut. Besides disease resistance, the synthetic Adenosine derivatives also showed a high level of variation in morphological traits and several backcross lines were selected for those traits (Table 5 and Table 6). Due to abnormal pairing during meiotic division in synthetic amphidiploids, arising of different types of allelic combinations in the segregating backcrossed populations was reported [20]. Thus, the introgression lines are of importance and need further evaluation, as they might harbor currently undetected genes useful for the improvement of groundnut. Seeds of the introgression lines are available on request from the University of Agricultural Sciences (UAS), Dharwad (Ramesh S. Bhat). Several wild species from the section Arachis had been successfully crossed with A. hypogaea and fertile hybrids [14], [15] and [16] and various backcross introgression lines were obtained [21]. Earlier Arachis glabrata Benth. from section Rhizomatosae was crossed with A.