Monitoring was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions, as described earlier (Ogawa et al, 2005). selleck chemicals Ixazomib In brief, a master mixture was prepared on ice, containing 1��l of cDNA, 2��l of DNA Master SYBER-Green I mix, 50ng of primers and 2.4��l of 25mM MgCl2. The final volume was adjusted to 20��l with water. After the reaction mixture was loaded into glass capillary tubes, quantitative RT�CPCR was performed with the following cycling conditions: initial denaturation at 95��C for 10min, followed by 40 cycles of 95��C for 10s, annealing at 62��C for 10s and extension at 72��C for 10s. After amplification, products were subjected to a temperature gradient from 67��C to 95��C at 0.2��Cs?1, under continuous fluorescence monitoring, to produce a melting curve of products.
Data analysis for RT�CPCR We used the LightCycler Software version 3.5 program (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Basel, Switzerland) to calculate the cycle numbers. After proportional baseline adjustment, a fit point method was used to determine the cycle in which the log-linear signal was first distinguishable from the baseline. This cycle number was used as the crossing point value. A standard curve was produced by measuring the crossing point of each standard value and plotting it against the logarithmic value of the concentration. Concentrations of unknown samples were calculated by plotting their crossing points against the standard curve and dividing by GAPDH content. The results of RT�CPCR were sent from Beppu to Tokyo for analyses.
Immunohistochemistry Immunohistochemistry was performed on paraffin-embedded specimens obtained from patients with metastatic gastric cancer and two healthy volunteers. Tissue sections were deparaffinised, soaked in 0.01M sodium citrate buffer and boiled in a microwave for 5min at 500W to retrieve cell antigens. The primary rabbit polyclonal antibody against ID1 (C-20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), which detects ID1 in paraffin-embedded human tissue sections and does not crossreact with ID2, ID3 or ID4 (Maruyama et al, 1999), was used at a dilution of 1:100. The blocking peptide to ID1 (sc-488P, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used as a negative control (Supplementary Figure 4). Tissue sections were immunohistochemically stained using the avidin�Cbiotin-peroxidase method (LSAB+ system-HRP; DAKO, Kyoto, Japan).
All sections were counterstained with haematoxylin. Statistical analysis The expression of ID1 was adjusted in each case for GAPDH expression. For continuous variables, data were expressed as the means��s.d. The relationship between ID1 mRNA expression and clinicopathlogical factors was analysed using a ��2 test and Drug_discovery Student’s t-test. All tests were analysed using JMP software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and the findings were considered significant when the P-value was <0.05.