None of the eyes had clinical signs of hypotony, like Descemet wr

None of the eyes had clinical signs of hypotony, like Descemet wrinkling or choroidal folds. All cases of hypotony had undergone 25-gauge vitrectomy. In 9 eyes (7.8%), the IOP was increased, defined as an IOP of 25 mm Hg or more. These were treated with topical antiglaucoma medication, and in all cases,

IOP returned to normal within 3 weeks after operation. Postoperative day 1 IOP was significantly higher after 20-gauge vitrectomy (mean, 16.2 mm Hg) than after 25-gauge vitrectomy (mean, 13.3 mm Hg; P = .011, Mann–Whitney U test). Thirty-six cases were phakic without cataract (31%), 54 cases (46.6%) were pseudophakic, and in 26 cases (22.4%), the vitrectomy was combined with cataract extraction. In the phakic cases, cataract developed during follow-up in 18 GSK1120212 nmr (50%). In 9 cases, the cataract already was treated before the end of follow-up. A macular pucker developed in 2 cases, 1 in a primary floater case and 1 in a case after uveitis. A choroidal hemorrhage occurred during 1 operation. The hemorrhage developed during the vitrectomy, but remained anterior to the equator and resolved spontaneously. RRD occurred in 3 cases (2.5%), all within 3 months after surgery. All 3 cases were operations Alisertib purchase for primary floaters. Two cases were attached after 1 operation and retained good VA. In 1 case, proliferative vitreoretinopathy developed,

requiring 3 retinal attachment procedures and ending with very poor visual function (VA of hand movements). In none of the 10 patients who had an RRD before the procedure did an RRD developed during follow-up. There were no cases of endophthalmitis in our series. Overall, the mean logMAR VA improved from 0.20 to 0.13 (P < .001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Improvement was significantly greater in cases where a combined vitrectomy and phacoemulsification was performed. Mean logMAR VA change was −0.06 for the phakic eyes (n = 36),

−0.02 for the pseudophakic eyes (n = 54), and −0.22 for the combined procedures (n = 26). This difference in improvement of VA was statistically significant (P < .001, Kruskal-Wallis test). Preoperative VA was on average MTMR9 lower in secondary cases (0.37) than in primary cases (0.15; P < .001, Mann–Whitney U test). We compared VA change between the primary and the secondary cases. In the 86 primary cases, the mean logMAR VA change was −0.058, and in the 30 secondary cases, the mean logMAR VA change was −0.127. Thus, in the secondary cases, the mean VA seemed to improve more than in the primary cases. This difference was not statistically significant (P = .192, Mann–Whitney U test). Despite the controversy surrounding vitrectomy for floaters, patients more and more demand recognition of their symptoms. Previous studies primarily have focused on outcome in terms of patient satisfaction. Using standardized questionnaires, all concluded that patient satisfaction after this procedure is high.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>