Psychol Health 25(4):401–415 doi:10 ​1080/​0887044080266088​4 Pu

Psychol Health 25(4):401–415. doi:10.​1080/​0887044080266088​4 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Shen D, Wu Y, Subbarao M, Bhat H, Chillar R, Vadgama JV (2000) Mutation analysis of BRCA1 gene in African-American patients with

breast cancer. J Natl Med Assoc 92(1):29–35PubMedCentralPubMed Simon MS, Petrucelli N (2009) Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome : the impact of race on uptake of genetic counseling and testing. Methods Mol Biol 471:487–500. doi:10.​1007/​978-1-59745-416-2_​25 PubMedCrossRef Susswein LR, Skrzynia Batimastat ic50 C, Lange LA, Booker JK, Graham ML 3rd, Evans JP (2008) Increased uptake of BRCA1/2 genetic testing among African American women with a recent diagnosis of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(1):32–36. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2007.​10.​6377 PubMedCrossRef

The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium (1999) Cancer risks in BRCA2 mutation Selleckchem AG-120 carriers. KPT-8602 datasheet J Natl Cancer Inst 91(15):1310–1316CrossRef Thompson HS, Valdimarsdottir HB, Duteau-Buck C, Guevarra J, Bovbjerg DH, Richmond-Avellaneda C, Amarel D, Godfrey D, Brown K, Offit K (2002) Psychosocial predictors of BRCA counseling and testing decisions among urban African-American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11(12):1579–1585PubMed Thompson HS, Valdimarsdottir HB, Jandorf L, Redd W (2003) Perceived disadvantages and concerns about abuses of genetic testing for

cancer risk: differences across African American, Latina and Caucasian women. Patient Educ Couns 51(3):217–227PubMedCrossRef US Census Bureau. (2011) Mean income in the past 12 months (in 2011 inflation-adjusted dollars) http://​factfinder2.​census.​gov/​faces/​tableservices/​jsf/​pages/​productview.​xhtml?​pid=​ACS_​11_​1YR_​S1902&​prodType=​table. Accessed 5 May 2013″
“Use of the broad knowledge about human genetic variation for the benefit of human health gives rise to a huge range of challenges. One of these challenges before was addressed at an international symposium held in Berlin in November 2011 entitled “Predictive Genetic Testing, Risk Communication and Risk Perception.” A particular focus of this meeting was the question how patients or consumers deal with the knowledge about their own individual genetic risks, i.e., to what extent this knowledge might change their attitudes towards a healthy lifestyle and their consequent behavior, or whether, on the contrary, it creates psychological harm (anxiety or misconception, e.g., false reassurance), rather than benefit to their health.

Comments are closed.