The disadvantage is that cryopreservation causes morphological and functional cell damage. However, it is widely accepted that the extension of cryodamage depends on many factors, such as cryopreservation protocols, species, developmental stage and if embryos were in vivo or in vitro produced [31]. An inevitable consequence of the cryopreservation is the cold-shock, which may affect intracellular organization or the inactivation of selleckchem enzyme systems [35]. Cryopreservation can be extremely disruptive to the cellular organization of embryos, and it has been showed by different authors that depolimerization

of microtubules and microfilaments occur after cryopreservation (reviewed in [12]). Moreover, mitochondria are essential for aerobic metabolism and ATP production in the cell, and mitochondrial functionality has been considered a hallmark of quality and developmental potential [15]. Although some works have focused attention on the functional capabilities of mitochondria after freezing [17], [25], [29] and [40], most of them were performed on isolated mitochondria. So, further investigations are necessary to understand how mitochondria are affected when whole embryos are cryopreserved. Cryopreserved sheep embryo transfer is not as widely practiced as in the cow; however it has become important with sheep

breeding modernization [24]. The cost of http://www.selleckchem.com/products/gsk-j4-hcl.html this technology is high

compared to the economic value of the animals [1], but breeders continue to search for ways to reduce the cost and improve the efficiency [3]. Slow-freezing and vitrification have both been used for the cryopreservation of sheep embryos, with variable survival rates. These rates vary from 53% to 70% after slow freezing of morulae in glycerol and EG [5] to 83.7% after slow freezing of blastocysts in EG [19] and [20]. Significant variability has also been observed in sheep embryo vitrification results. While some studies found embryo survival rates of 60–85% after warming [1], [8], [21], [24] and [33], others only reached rates close to 30% or 50% [3], [22] and [30]. Although there why are effective protocols to cryopreserve sheep embryos, and even though the survival rates are good, it is possible that embryos are suffering damages that not lead them to death. However, describing the changes in organelles is not a usual approach. Recently, Bettencourt et al. [2] compared slow freezing and vitrification methods of ovine embryos and described ultrastructural findings. Still, no reports on the cytoskeleton structure and mitochondrial activity were discussed after these procedures. In addition, some authors [5], [6] and [7] doubted the effectiveness of the stereomicroscope to evaluate cellular damage during embryo cryopreservation, a phenomenon more commonly observed using other methods.