There are many examples of the latter

being the case For

There are many examples of the latter

being the case. For discussion of confounding of diversity and other biotic this website indices with natural spatial and temporal variation (see McGowan and Fraundorf, 1966, Pianka, 1966, Hilsenhoff, 1998, Bergen et al., 2000 and Hamilton, 2010). See Bergen et al. (2000) and Smith et al., 1999 and Smith et al., 2001 for use of their Benthic Response Index (BRI) with a procedure for separating spatial gradients of natural habitats (substrate, depth, latitude) from high versus low chemical exposure at a discharge. Some who are aware of the spatial/temporal confounding problem propose using multimetrics, which include metrics for different places or times such as seasons, thus compounding index-confusion. To avoid the problem of “who knows exactly what diversity Epacadostat molecular weight indices

are responding to?”, biotic indices have been derived to respond to pollution-induced changes in abundances of species that have been shown to be sensitive or resistant to specific contaminants (e.g., Hilsenhoff, 1987, Hilsenhoff, 1998, Karr, 1981, Karr, 1987, Karr, 1991, Kerans and Karr, 1994 and Karr Beta adrenergic receptor kinase and Chu, 1999). A simple ratio of abundances of a number of sensitive species to a number of resistant species

might exhibit the desired properties, although such a ratio variable would have poor statistical properties (see discussion below). Such “purpose-derived” biotic indices transition into the indicator species concept (Smith et al., 1999 and Bergen et al., 2000). Such “targeted” approaches are good for detection of particular pollution impacts selected a priori, but may not respond interpretably if there is a different impact. Chessman and McEvoy (1998) propose constructing “a suite of indices, each assembled using sensitivity numbers targeted to a particular impact”, to overcome this problem, a multimetric approach (see below). Multimetric” seems to have two meanings. Smith et al. (1999) describe one: combining “multiple measures of community response into a single index”. But sometimes the meaning seems to be to measure all sorts of things and report them all, hoping that everything important has been included. Some multimetric references are: Paller and Specht, 1997, Llanso et al., 2002 and Whittier et al., 2007, and Stoddard et al. (2008).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>