The regression line of the scatter plot has a slope signif icantly larger than unity, which indicates that mRNAs with greater than average TE in WT tend to be translated at rela tively lower efficiencies in the mutant cells. Moreover, mRNAs with lower than average TE in WT tend to be translated relatively better compound library in the mutant. Considering the 2934 genes with TE values larger than the genome average in wild type cells, the TEWT TE4G ratio is 1. 14. For the remaining genes with TE values smaller than the genome average, the mean TEWT TE4G ratio is 0. 91. As a consequence of these trends, there is a nar rower range of translational efficiencies at both ends of the spectrum, in mutant versus WT cells. This last conclusion was further supported by tabulat ing the numbers of mRNAs with TE values above or below unity between mutant and WT cells.

In WT, 968 mRNAs have mean TEs 1. 5, and 223 mRNAs have mean TE values 2. 0. In the mutant cells these gene categories are much smaller, indicating that a considerably smaller proportion of mRNAs have higher than average translational efficiencies in the mutant cells. A similar trend applies to mRNAs with relatively low TE values. Thus, the propor tions of mRNAs translated with either higher or lower than average translational efficiencies are reduced on depletion of eIF4G. The fact that the range of translational efficiencies is restricted by eIF4G depletion implies that eIF4G contri butes to the higher than average TE values for the most efficiently translated mRNAs in WT cells. To verify this deduction, we determined the proportion of the mRNAs with TEWT values 1.

5 that are translated more effi ciently in WT versus mutant cells, ie. TEWT 1. 5 �� TEWT TE4G. This condition holds for 97% of the 968 mRNAs with TEWT 1. 5. A similar conclusion emerged for the 917 mRNAs with TEWT 0. 67, of which 90% are translated less efficiently in WT than in mutant cells. This last comparison confirms that the least efficiently translated group of mRNAs in WT cells owe their relatively low TE values, at least partly, to the presence of eIF4G function. Below, we consider different mechanisms that could account for this negative effect of eIF4G on translational efficiency.

Only a small proportion of genes exhibit substantially altered translational efficiencies on depletion of eIF4G We focused next on the particular mRNAs whose translational efficiencies differ the most between mutant and WT cells Because the difference in TE between mutant and WT cells is modest for the majority of mRNAs, coupled with the experimental variability in TE values calculated from the different projects, there is a small fraction of genes for which the difference between mean TE4G Carfilzomib and TEWT values calculated from all three projects is statistically signifi cant. We were able to identify 94 mRNAs that exhibit mean TE4G TEWT ratios of 0.